國立屏東大學學報:教育類  2019/04
第三期 (Vol.3)     111-143
 
中文晤談評量問卷內部結構及信效度之探究:諮商心理師層次分析  
A Study of Internal Structure of the Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire(C-SEQ): Counselor-Level Analyses
陳慶福
Ching-Fu Chen
劉嘉蕙
Chia-Hui Liu
中文摘要
晤談評量問卷(Session Evaluation Questionnaire, SEQ)過去經常被作為評量諮商影響的用途,最新版SEQ-5係由21對語意區分的相對應形容詞組成,各題項採1-7點評量的方式計分。本研究探討心理師在中文第五版晤談評量問卷(Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire, C-SEQ)的內部結構,以2017年4月至2017年7月間,在台灣34所大學諮商輔導中心的心理師N = 187為參與者,以每位參與者最近一次接案後所填答的一份C-SEQ,共計187份,探討心理師在C-SEQ的因素結構、C-SEQ的內部相關和內部一致性。研究結果:以C-SEQ晤談評量向度和晤談後情感評量向度各10題,進行探索性因素分析,結果顯示C-SEQ在晤談評量向度,和在晤談後情感向度分別包含:深度性、順暢性,以及正向性和覺醒性四個因素的結構,C-SEQ在深度性、順暢性和正向性間存有低度到中度的相關(rs = .16 - .64, ps < .05),以及C-SEQ四個因素具有中高度的內部一致性信度(α = .57-.87),整體問卷具有高度的一致性信度(α = .87)。心理師層次的C-SEQ可作為諮商歷程實務和諮商研究之用途。
中文關鍵字

英文摘要
The Session Evaluation Questionnaire(SEQ) has been applied to measure the
impact of counseling sessions. The SEQ Form 5 (the most recent version) includes 21 items in a 7-point bipolar adjective format. The items are divided into two sections: session evaluation and postsession mood evaluation. The stem 'This session was' precedes the first 11 items(session evaluation). The stem 'Right now I feel' precedes the second 10 items (postsession mood evaluation). The purpose of this research attempts to explore the internal structure of the Chinese Session Evaluation(C-SEQ) of counselor level. The C-SEQ data were collected in a heterogeneous convenience sample of 187 participants at 34 universities in Taiwan, with each participant completed one copy of C-SEQ over the course of her/his latest individual counseling, and data collecting were from April, 2017 to July, 2017. The findings of this study indicated that the counselors showed actual responses toward the C-SEQ. The results of this study suggested that four factors elicited from the C-SEQ were corroborated, namely Depth, Smoothness, Positivity, and Arousal. Thus, the C-SEQ is comprised of two dimensions of session evaluation, Depth and Smoothness, as well as two dimensions of postsession mood, Positivity and Arousal. The C-SEQ yields four factors. And intercorrelation among depth, smoothness and positivity of C-SEQ has been low to medium(rs = .16 - .64 , ps< .05). The internal consistency coefficients(Cronbach's α) of the four factors has been middle to high(α = .57 - .87), and the total internal consistency of the C-SEQ has been high(α = .87). The C-SEQ is available as an instrument for counseling practice and research.
英文關鍵字